Figured I'd update the Pac-12 Standings from the last 4 years that I posted in an earlier thread now that the conference season is complete.
1. Oregon: 47-25 (.653), 2 titles, 2 top 3 finishes
2. USC: 46-28 (.622), 0 titles, 3 top 3 finishes
3. UCLA: 45-28 (.616), 0 titles, 2 top 3 finishes
4. Arizona: 44-30 (.595), 1 title, 1 top 3 finish
5. Colorado: 42-32 (.568), 0 titles, 1 top 3 finish
6. ASU: 38-33 (.535), 0 titles, 2 top 3 finishes
7. Stanford: 38-36 (.514), 0 titles, 1 top 3 finish
8. Utah: 37-36 (.507), 0 titles, 2 top 3 finishes
9. UW: 34-40 (.459), 1 title, 1 top 3 finish
9. OSU: 34-40 (.459), 0 titles, 0 top 3 finishes
11. Wazzu: 21-52 (.288), 0 titles, 0 top 3 finishes
12. Cal: 15-59 (.203), 0 titles, 0 top 3 finishes
A lot of good here for USC, obviously, with the 2nd best conference record and most finishes in the top 3. The bad is, of course, the lack of a conference championship, especially since they were in complete control of the league this year at 13-2 with just 5 games to play.
Speaks pretty well to the consistency versus high-end potential issue that was discussed in that thread.
1. Oregon: 47-25 (.653), 2 titles, 2 top 3 finishes
2. USC: 46-28 (.622), 0 titles, 3 top 3 finishes
3. UCLA: 45-28 (.616), 0 titles, 2 top 3 finishes
4. Arizona: 44-30 (.595), 1 title, 1 top 3 finish
5. Colorado: 42-32 (.568), 0 titles, 1 top 3 finish
6. ASU: 38-33 (.535), 0 titles, 2 top 3 finishes
7. Stanford: 38-36 (.514), 0 titles, 1 top 3 finish
8. Utah: 37-36 (.507), 0 titles, 2 top 3 finishes
9. UW: 34-40 (.459), 1 title, 1 top 3 finish
9. OSU: 34-40 (.459), 0 titles, 0 top 3 finishes
11. Wazzu: 21-52 (.288), 0 titles, 0 top 3 finishes
12. Cal: 15-59 (.203), 0 titles, 0 top 3 finishes
A lot of good here for USC, obviously, with the 2nd best conference record and most finishes in the top 3. The bad is, of course, the lack of a conference championship, especially since they were in complete control of the league this year at 13-2 with just 5 games to play.
Speaks pretty well to the consistency versus high-end potential issue that was discussed in that thread.
Comment